Wer mag, kann hier für Richard als nächsten Bond voten. Ob es allerdings die Entscheidungsträger/innen beeinflusst, sei dahingestellt:
Zitat:
British GQ@BritishGQ
Keen for @RCArmitage to be the next James Bond? Vote here:
http://gq.uk/3iBgSO https://twitter.com/BritishGQ/status/653978612337541120Der Artikel:
Zitat:
Who should be the next James Bond? Cast your vote
By Max Williams 08 October 15
Daniel Craig may well be finished with James Bond. He's been a great 007, and hopefully Spectre proves a worthy swansong, but who should pick up the keys to the Aston? From Tom Hardy to Nicholas Hoult we assess the likely candidates - and you can pick your preferred Bond in the poll at the bottom of the page. Odds on each actor are provided by Paddy Power should you wish to have a little flutter.
Tom Hardy (7 / 4)
Arguably the acting talent of his generation.
Why: He's box office, pure and simple. How many actors could pull off a one man film (as Hardy did in Locke) and then play both leading roles in another (the recent Legend)? He plays a suave, vaguely Bondish figure in Christopher Nolan's Inception. Not only does Tom Hardy physically resemble Fleming's Bond, he would bring a dangerous edge and devastating talent. Hard to think of a more suitable candidate.
Why not: Bond might be too mainstream for the independent-minded Hardy. He likes creative freedom, as roles in Locke, The Drop and London Road attest. His blockbuster work with Nolan were both one-off appearances, not recurring franchise roles. Plus Hardy may have just found his ideal franchise in the innovative, critically acclaimed Mad Max. Bond may want Hardy more than Hardy wants Bond.
Damian Lewis (2 / 1)
Forget black Bond - surely a ginger Bond would mark the true revolution.
Why: After shining in Homeland and Wolf Hall, this is very much Damian Lewis's moment. He's an incredibly smooth performer and would offer a refreshing change after the bluntness of Craig. His 2013 Jaguar short film Desire - in which Lewis plays a mystery courier entangled with a beautiful woman - plays like an extended audition for the role: one he passes, comfortably. Plus it would strike a blow for red heads everywhere.
Why not: Again, age. The 44-year-old Lewis would be the oldest debut Bond by 2017 - and that's assuming Craig departs after Spectre. (If Craig stays on, forget it.) Can we really have a Bond who could feasibly be the wrong side of 50 by his second film? Entering Roger Moore territory and nobody wants to go there. Could be a red herring.
Idris Elba (3 / 1)
The charismatic Londoner would be a popular choice with critics and fans alike.
Why: How long have you got? Tall, handsome, dashing, suave as Stringer Bell, tough as John Luther - Elba ticks every box going. He's an established name but not so famous as to overshadow the character. His casting would be historic, obviously, but Elba feels less a "Black Bond" than a natural Bond who happens to be black. Which is exactly as it should be. Perfect fit x historic casting = better than perfect.
Why not: the moment might have passed. Elba is 43: only four years younger than Daniel Craig. Even if Craig resigned tomorrow, Elba's arguably too old to take up the role. If Craig makes a fifth film - still very possible - then his candidacy is deader than a Spectre henchman. Could well be the greatest Bond Who Never Was.
Henry Cavill (4 / 1)
If anybody can combine Superman and Bond then it's the dashing Brit.
Why: Draw a picture of Bond and the result would be Henry Cavill. Square-jawed, broad shouldered, dark haired, blue eyed. Classically handsome but could clearly take you in a fight. Auditioning for the role, aged 22, in 2005, Cavill reached the final two before Craig edged him out. (Apparently it was a virtual toss-up.) Ten years later, matured as an actor and a man, surely he should go one better?
Why not: Too many franchises. Cavill cuts a dashing figure but nobody can be Superman and James Bond. It would be too distracting, the scheduling would be a nightmare, and your ego would probably explode. Likewise, Cavill's recent stint as Napoleon Solo (another likely franchise) is probably too Bond: ditch Solo's American accent and it's the same character. Bond may have missed out on him.
Michael Fassbender (10 / 1)
A serious thespian, comfortably mixing superheroes and Shakespeare.
Why: Along with Hardy and Cavill, Michael Fassbender rounds off the trio of Hollywood heavyweights. And like those two British A-listers, Fassbender appears a perfect choice as cinema's favourite spy. Revisit his scene-stealing Lieutenant Archie Hicox in Inglourious Basterds for irrefutable evidence. Still only 38, this is an actor at the height of his powers.
Why not: While Fassbender combines the appeal of Hardy and Cavill, he also shares their drawbacks. Like Hardy, Fassbender may now be a touch too famous for the role. Like Cavill, other franchise commitments - in this case X Men and potentially Assassin's Creed - further muddy the waters. None of the trio really need Bond but Fassbender - tipped for Oscar glory for his role as Steve Jobs - probably needs 007 the least.
Richard Armitage (14 / 1)
The Hobbit star has the stature for the role.
Why: The dictionary definition of "tall, dark and handsome", Richard Armitage would make an imposing 007. He's a brooding presence, typically cast as the antihero, whether Thorin Oakenshield in The Hobbit or Guy of Gisborne in the BBC version of Robin Hood. His Bond would certainly be closer to Timothy Dalton than Roger Moore, and Armitage would be a perfect choice should the producers wish to darken the mood of the series. A stalwart of theatre and television, Armitage certainly as the credentials for Bond; while his major role in The Hobbit required a bushy beard and a height of around 4 foot so there shouldn't be too much overlap.
Why not: At the risk of sounding like a broken record, Armitage is another one whose age might rule him out. 44 isn't too old to play Bond but it's probably too old to start playing Bond. Like Elba and Lewis, one feels his moment was instead of Craig not replacing him. Most of his celebrated roles: Thorin, Guy and his breakout performance in North and South came in period pieces - would his face fit in the resolutely modern 21st century Bond.
David Oyelowo (14 / 1)
A wonderful actor and another potentially historic choice.
Why: David Oyelowo would certainly be the most left field choice on this list - and interesting casting often works better than the obvious. Selma left no doubt about Oyelowo's acting ability; he could make your shopping list sound riveting. He's the right level of famous - Oyelowo could truly be Bond, in a way the more famous Michael Fassbender, say, might always be Michael Fassbender being Bond.
Why not: Obvious choices are obvious for a reason. Oyelowo is a brilliant actor but Bond requires more than mere acting ability: you need a style, a presence, a killer touch. Looking down Oyelowo's filmography it's hard to find a role that screams "Bond-in-waiting". He feels more MI6 staff than 007. Also, and this sounds petty, Oyelowo is 5'8. Bond can certainly be black - but short? Granted he's no Nick Nack but still feels odd. Then again, so did Heath Ledger as the Joker once upon a time.
Aidan Turner (20 / 1)
The brooding Irishman stealing hearts across the nation.
Why: After Poldark, the legion of female fans is guaranteed. That and The Hobbit (he played a dwarf) proved Turner has the requisite swashbuckle to convince as a superspy. At 32, the age is right even if Craig stays for one last mission. Both Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan graduated from television lead to James Bond; Turner would follow a similar trajectory. He would offer a fresh take on Bond - hard to imagine Turner crashing through walls a la Craig - but his fierce good looks certainly fit the profile.
Why not: Superficially there's few obvious impediments to Turner: profile, age and look all feel about right. The real issue is star power: could he carry the longest running cinematic franchise of all time? Sunday nights on the BBC is one thing; pulling off James Bond is quite another. Were Fassbender or Hardy to throw their hat on the stand it seems unlikely Turner could fend them off. But who knows what might happen in the screen test.
Nicholas Hoult (33 / 1)
The golden boy of British acting looks ready for superstardom.
Why: This would be another brave choice with the potential to pay dividends. A young, hungry British actor with franchise experience but no defining role: Nicholas Hoult has the talent to grab the franchise by the scruff of the neck. He's a very different actor to Craig, smoother and less physical: it would refreshing to see a new interpretation of the character. Plus, as Hoult has repeatedly proved on his journey from child star to Hollywood heartthrob, the boy can really act.
Why not: High of cheekbone, cherubic of lip - is Hoult too pretty for Bond? Can you really imagine him beating a henchman to a pulp? At 25 Hoult would be the youngest Bond, and compared to the weathered Daniel Craig he might look more One Direction than 007. Assuming he doesn't land a different franchise lead, Hoult should be the perfect eighth Bond in a decade. Just not the seventh one right now.
Luke Evans (33 / 1)
An intriguing candidate who certainly had support on Twitter.
Why: Look at him. Lose the moustache, trim the hair and you have James Bond sprung from the pages Fleming's novels. Fast & Furious 6 proved his action credentials, while the stoically heroic Bard from The Hobbit is the James Bond of Middle Earth, only duller. But it's his titular role in Dracula Untold that really sells the prospect of Luke Evans as James Bond, 007. He's established but hardly a megastar and, at 36, Evans could nail down the role for a decade or more. Plus how good would it be for an openly gay actor to play cinema's most famous womaniser?
Why not: For whatever reason, the Evans candidacy hasn't yet caught fire. Strangely, a lack of television experience may prove a drawback - whereas most names on this list built up their profile on the small screen, Evans has always been a theatre or film man. As a result, he may be more unfamiliar to British audience than somebody with his success deserves. However he certainly has a passionate fan base and may well be better placed than the odds indicate.
http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/entertainment/articles/2015-10/07/next-james-bond-idris-elba-tom-hardyViel Spaß!